mind Archives - The Systems Thinker https://thesystemsthinker.com/tag/mind/ Sun, 05 Nov 2017 20:42:06 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 Embodying Change: A Whole Systems Approach https://thesystemsthinker.com/embodying-change-a-whole-systems-approach/ https://thesystemsthinker.com/embodying-change-a-whole-systems-approach/#respond Fri, 22 Jan 2016 10:16:57 +0000 http://systemsthinker.wpengine.com/?p=1631 hen the ancient Greeks explored what constituted the ideal citizen, they identified four qualities: physically fit and strong, emotionally balanced and mature, mentally agile and alert, and having a spiritual or moral order. They saw those qualities as living in the soma – the embodiment of the self. The Greeks viewed the living body in […]

The post Embodying Change: A Whole Systems Approach appeared first on The Systems Thinker.

]]>
When the ancient Greeks explored what constituted the ideal citizen, they identified four qualities: physically fit and strong, emotionally balanced and mature, mentally agile and alert, and having a spiritual or moral order. They saw those qualities as living in the soma – the embodiment of the self. The Greeks viewed the living body in its wholeness – mind, body, and spirit as one.

Somatics is a whole systems view that addresses the nature of how we operate and what shapes our perceptions, opinions, and actions. It deals with our innate structure, moving beyond any superficial investigation of body language or posture. The principles of Somatics recognize that the self is indistinguishable from the body, from our lived experience. Somatic practices such as deep breathing, centering, gratitude, and curiosity are effective because they retrain the nervous system by attending to the self as a whole, rather than treating it like a machine to be managed. In this way, real change can take root and become lasting experience.

In our culture, talking about the body can be tricky, because we link it to appearance, fitness, and health, relegating it to the status of an object to be managed. The body is often considered an inert mass activated by something else, the mind or the spirit. For our purposes, we hold the notion of the body very differently: We see it as an intelligent, awake, and powerful part of an organic unity. To arrive at this understanding, we must investigate and mend the mind-body schism that disconnects us from ourselves and keeps us trapped in our heads, trying to win the battle of mind over matter.

Overcoming the Mind-Body Schism

TEAM TIP

When team members recognize how their bodies respond to stress, they can take steps to release their tension, whether going for a short walk or consciously relaxing their shoulder muscles. By doing so, they can deal with work problems more productively.

One profound cause of the schism between body and mind is that we have learned to mistrust or disregard our senses. We’ve lost touch with what poet Mary Oliver calls “the soft animal of your body.” Living as though we’re disembodied (numb or disconnected), we lose touch with our self-direction. Rather than forge ahead with a firm sense of purpose, we’re caught in the drift of whatever thought or action prevails; we go wherever we’re led.

Think about it: Can you really separate yourself from your biology, your experience, your history? We are informed by our lived experience. It influences what we perceive and how we react to everything we encounter.

I grew up as a military kid. We lived a few hundred yards from the flight line, and my days began and ended with the scream and quake of jets taking off. When our windows rattled, it was a sign to me that all was right with the world. Now as an adult, whenever the Blue Angels come to my area, I always make sure that when they fly over, I am close enough so my whole body thunders with the vibration. My system relishes the experience. Someone who has lived in a war zone would experience the sensation very differently.

If you went to a strict school where you were ridiculed for making mistakes, it’s not likely that you are the first one to offer a new idea at work. If you grew up with lots of siblings and not quite enough food, you probably eat fast. If you have traveled internationally and adapted to constant change, chances are good that you feel energized in new settings rather than frightened. We are formed or shaped by our experience. That shape, or soma, influences who we are. Along with our life story, our soma determines what is possible (and improbable) in our experience.

For a moment, slump in your chair, drop your chin to your chest, tighten your back and shoulders, make your breathing shallow, squint your eyes, and tighten your gut. Now get out there and be great! Lead that team, sell that project, host that event, attract that partner – you’re a sure bet! It’s absurd, right? We intrinsically know that this tight soma we’ve crunched ourselves into is just not consistent with effectiveness. Even so, many of us are still living in some chronic variation of this shape, and we struggle all the harder because of it.

Most of us have been practicing contraction for decades, holding a tension-filled soma that makes ease and flow feel a long way off. The good news is that when we begin to recognize how we have been shaped, we can begin to change our way of being and reshape ourselves to experience life with ease.

The Body Is Not a Taxi for the Brain

Let’s start where we all start, as babies. The work of Daniel Stern, MD, focuses on infant development. He has found that:

“All mental acts are accompanied by input from the body, including all the things the body does or must do to permit, support, and amplify the ongoing mental activity, postures formed or held, movements of the eyes, head, or body, displacements of space, and contractions and relaxations of muscular tone.”

The body and mind inform each other, and our resulting mental constructs create what Stern refers to as the embodied mind. The way we learned things in the beginning is how we continue to learn them: through the body-mind loop.

In his book Descartes’ Error, neurologist Antonio Damasio confirms the mind-body loop and describes how we can step in and make changes, how we can self-observe and self-regulate so that we don’t allow our “negative body state” to negatively affect our mental state as well (see “The Mind-Body Loop”). The process requires, first, that we be in touch with our own sensations.

Under stress, we tighten. Our bodily system contracts muscles, constricts blood vessels, alters breathing, and generally prepares for danger. It is designed to do so very efficiently for a brief period of time, and then to return to a more relaxed and fluid state. Sadly, what is meant to be a brief and intense organization of the human system has become a chronic way of being for many of us. Our muscles stay rigid and tight. We grind our teeth in our sleep. We’re squeezed in and up, losing our sense of groundedness or flexibility. We’re trapped in a conditioned reaction that perceives everything as more reason to bear down.

THE MIND-BODY LOOP

THE MIND-BODY LOOP

In his book Descartes’ Error, neurologist Antonio Damasio confirms the mind-body loop and describes how we can self-observe and self-regulate so that we don’t allow our “negative body state” to negatively affect our mental state as well. The process requires, first, that we be in touch with our own sensations.

Without the Body, Never Mind

I’m not a fan of suffering or struggle. In fact, my life’s work is devoted to interrupting struggle wherever I find it. As an educator and executive coach, seeing people stuck in stories or somas that strangle their aliveness launches me into action. I have witnessed myself and others valiantly trying to change our lives strictly within the mind-over-matter Cartesian model by conceptualizing, intellectualizing, rationalizing, and willing ourselves into a new reality.

This method is insufficient, however, given our human nature. We are intricate psychobiological beings, not merely minds to be programmed with new data. When I was first introduced to the discourses of Somatics about 15 years ago, I knew I had found the element that had been missing from all the well-intended work of personal and cultural transformation I had been involved with. I became an avid student. My teacher, Richard Strozzi-Heckler, has taken this important work to governments and corporations, consulting with such organizations as NATO and the Marine Corps. When I seek hope for the future, I take our cultural welcoming of Somatic principles as a very good sign. And in my own experience, I have found corporations, leaders, parents, entrepreneurs, and social leaders grateful for this powerful approach for personal and organizational change.

Strozzi-Heckler tells us: “By living in our body we can generate a presence that has the power to allow genuine contact with our most inner core, with others, and with the environment. I have come to believe that by living close to our bodily and energetic processes, we may lead lives of increasing wholeness and purpose.”

I’ve seen these changes, even in individuals and organizations for which exhaustion and defeat had gained what seemed like a permanent stronghold. By understanding our soma and learning to listen to its messages, we become equipped to create a new reality.

Thawing Out Our Life Force

Embodiment is the result of what we practice. Sadly, most of us have been practicing various forms of contraction for many years. We learned early on to squeeze down our sensations, be they excitement (“People don’t like little girls who are too loud”) or distress (“If you keep crying, I’m going to have to put you down”). How open and alive can you be if your breath is high and shallow, your shoulders are tense, and your jaw is tightly clenched?

PRACTICE

Noticing Our Sensations

While you’re reading, don’t change a thing about the way you are sitting. Just begin to observe. How would you describe your breathing? Is it shallow, full, tight, small, slow, fast? (This is no time for judging, just observe.)

Let your attention scan through your body, starting at the top of your head. Scalp, face, eyes, jaw. Does it feel fluid or congested inside your skull? Throat, neck, shoulders – if you rated them (say one is relaxed and seven is tense), what number would you assign to each?

Chest, back, arms, stomach. Do you feel movement, energy, dullness, discomfort, flexibility? Hips, organs, buttocks, genitals. Are they tight, relaxed? What do you notice? Legs, thighs, knees, calves, shins, feet, toes. Can you feel contact with the floor? Do some areas feel more alive than others?

The game here is to notice. The path to freedom begins with self-awareness, coming to know what is. Although we might want to race ahead to judge and categorize what we find, this actually precludes learning. And right now we’re information gatherers. So just let yourself notice whatever you notice.

The language of sensation is new to many of us. You may not have words to describe what you find. You may not be able to locate any sensations to observe. Remember that we have been trained to dull down our senses and impulses, either to fit in or to tolerate our surroundings. Unfreezing all this takes both practice and a healthy measure of curiosity.

I perfected the clenched jaw decades ago. I’ve since learned that when I hold my jaw tight, it determines how I interact with the world. Life becomes a series of hurdles to be conquered. Even if I’m not upset about anything, my tight jaw will lead me to feel I’ve got to get this done or This is hard or I have to get through this.

The good news is now I know that one place I regularly contract is my jaw. As soon as I’m clenched, my day changes from a bright package of possibility to one huge, daunting ToDo List.

By continually checking in with what’s happening in my soma, I can catch my clenched jaw early and then I can relax it. I may have to relax it a dozen times throughout the day. But every time I do, I’m interrupting an old pattern and replacing it with a new one. In the meantime, my day begins flowing much more smoothly.

How do you get to Carnegie Hall? Practice, practice, practice. We are always practicing something, and what we practice, we become. In fact, the body is incapable of not practicing. Under stress, 99.9 percent of us will gravitate to our accustomed practices, our embodied way of being. David Morris, in his paper “Placebos, Pain and Belief,” says that our biology, like our culture, limits the world we recognize and respond to. When we release the contraction in our bodies, our world expands, too.

The Shape of Our Experience

How have you shaped or configured yourself in a way that is life-suppressing, that is not available to ease and flow, that squeezes down aliveness? Yes, I’m flagrantly assuming that you have a habit of contraction, given that you’re a member of this culture. What is your customized, highly sophisticated, well-practiced personal separation strategy? And once you’re out, where do you go? You can find your suppressing practice by watching what is habitual (embodied) in how you operate.

It’s Monday morning. Today is the day you present your team’s new project to your boss and other executives. You stayed up late last night preparing. You need to drop your kids off at daycare on the way to work. The clothes you planned to wear are still at the cleaners. How do you move with all this: are you tight or at ease, hopeful or filled with dread?

Using the list in “Open Versus Contracted,” note which traits or symptoms best describe your normal experience. Where on the continuum of Open to Contracted do you spend more time? What are the results you produce from there? What is your energy level like at the end of the day? What impact does that have on your interactions and relationships? On your self-esteem? What’s the deeply embedded story (masquerading as truth) that lives in your soma?

When we live in contraction, the tension keeps us disturbed and attending to what’s wrong. We think, “There must be a problem if I’m this tight and anxious.”

OPEN VERSUS CONTRACTED

OPEN VERSUS CONTRACTED

Our body informs our thinking and our mood. If we consistently hang out in our physical tensions, we can actually become addicted to struggle; in an odd way, struggle becomes our comfort zone. Many of us build our identity around making continued noble efforts in the face of almost certain defeat. We’re in a cultural harness that says the way to be attractive is to look strong and hide our vulnerability. So we squeeze down a little tighter and separate ourselves a little more. Just look at a person’s soma, or shape. (We’re talking about the shape of lived experience, not clothing size.) The shape we inhabit over time becomes our outlook on life. Our separation strategies are our stories in action.

Mick was a struggling entrepreneur who lived by the story that “Life is unsafe.” If something didn’t happen as he hoped it would, he immediately moved into resignation. It didn’t take any effort at all for him to go there – it was his default mode, and he had been practicing it for years. You can imagine what the shape of resignation looks like: rounded shoulders, flaccid belly, crumpled chest, lips pursed, and eyes dull. As Mick shifted into a new orientation of “Great things just keep happening to me,” it was amazing to see how he changed. He practiced a new shape, a new way of being, that included coming up to his full height, letting his shoulders rest back and down, breathing fully into the belly, feeling his feet solidly planted and his face relaxed and responsive.

We’re not talking about body language or posture. Such terms refer to the body as an object, a thing we configure by putting arms this way and tilting the head that way for a certain effect. Shape is our lived experience; it reveals who we are. Maybe our parents knew something when they told us to stand up straight because it produced a different mood for us to live in than being hunched down or drawn back. While shape may reflect cultural differences, travel to any country and you can see who has a sense of freedom and self-direction and who does not, just by observing how they inhabit their somas. A person raised in a position of authority is trained to take the shape of a leader or a sovereign. Such people are believable, coherent to themselves and those around them. They become the self that leads.

There’s no question that we are formed and shaped by our history, whether that means never forgetting how to ride a bicycle or flinching at the sight of the family home we lived in 30 years ago. What we experience lives in our bodies and informs our actions and reactions daily. Wilhelm Reich, the Austrian psychoanalyst of the early 1900s, was among the first to recognize muscular armoring as a reaction to stress, either current or historical. If you were yelled at frequently as a child, you might have developed protective muscular armoring in your neck and shoulders. Your eyes might be chronically squeezed. The yelling might have stopped decades ago, but if your muscles never got the message that they don’t need to contract anymore, they’re still on duty whether or not yelling is present. The armoring you took on was absolutely the right choice at the time because it helped you take care of yourself. But based on who you are and what you want today, it may be time for a different shape.

Taking Off a Tight Shoe

Once something is embodied, it becomes automatic, especially when we’re under stress. This is both the good news and the bad news. We have been conditioned a certain way. Duane Elgin, in his book Voluntary Simplicity, suggests we would do well to acknowledge how much we act in preprogrammed ways. “We live ensnared in an automated, reflexive, and dreamlike reality,” he writes, “that is a subtle and continuously changing blend of fantasy, inner dialogue, memory, planning, and so on.”

When we recognize what creates our experience, we can change it.

Don’t despair, however. We are not locked forever into the trances we have embodied. At the same time, I’m not here to blow sunshine by telling you that the whole process is a simple matter of relaxing your muscles and thinking happy thoughts. We must address things as they are, things we can count on.

One thing we can count on is that human nature is changeable.

We are living beings, not inert clumps. We are made of live, malleable substances in constant flux. Dr. Amit Goswami, who wrote the textbook on quantum mechanics, confirms that “atoms are not things, they are tendencies.”

When we recognize what creates our experience, we can change it. We can then respect, even revere, our human psychobiology, rather than ignoring it or trying to wish our way to a better life. Coming into a new relationship with embodiment, we become effective players in this game of life. Our awareness is our ace in the deck.

The person who wears a perpetual frown even when she is “relaxed” – how do you suppose that person sees the world? Or the one who inhabits a rigid back, tight arms, and hard eyes – what is she expecting life to deliver? If someone doesn’t know that it’s possible to inhabit life another way, she remains trapped. In contrast, the person who breathes deep and easy, who holds minimal tension in the shoulders, who lifts the heart and chest – she has a very different experience of life. The root of the word courage means heart. When we collapse the chest, we become easily discouraged, dis-heartened. When we fill our space and widen our chest, there is suddenly room for connection, purpose, and passion.

Our shape doesn’t impact only us, it affects those around us. The shape we take on creates our identity, and others respond to us based on the shape they see. Remember, we humans are always deciding what everything means. All I need to do is look at you, and I create an instant story about you based on what I see; it’s an automatic process. Just as an actor takes on a certain shape to get in character, we can experiment with how we inhabit ourselves until we find the soma that best supports what we care about. We can choose to inhabit the shape that encourages the unrestricted flow of life.

Saying “Yes” to the Flow

Thank goodness for great teachers! Our dog Tucker adopted us seven years ago, probably because she saw how much we needed to learn about real pleasure. The way she stalks a squirrel (which she has absolutely no intention of catching) is an exquisite act of choreography. Her muscles tremble with excitement, and she places each paw so slowly that the squirrel doesn’t even notice she’s moved closer. Her nose twitches as she draws in every scent, until her waiting explodes in a final burst of speed as she chases the squirrel up the tree, following it all the way to a second-tier branch. Then she proudly trots into the house, slurps up a loud, luscious drink of water, and paws the rug until it’s just right as she walks the secret number of circles that make her ready to throw herself down with a satisfied sigh. In minutes she drifts into a contented asleep.

Tucker gives herself completely to the moment, just as Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi describes in his book Flow, a study in the state of high performance. In the state of flow, the moment is rewarding in and of itself. There is no split attention. This, I realized one day, is exactly the state that Tucker effortlessly inhabits. Whether she’s tracking a squirrel or drinking water or preparing for a nap, she’s completely in touch with her sensations and uses them to enhance her experience and her action. The more she feels, the more alive she is. And it gives her impeccable timing, with no action wasted.

I am fascinated by Tucker’s unabashed experience of pleasure. My default mode has always been to settle for relief instead. When I’m stressed or pushed or uncomfortable, relief sounds pretty good. At such times, I think that anywhere other than where I am would be preferable. But here’s the problem: Relief takes me in the opposite direction from pleasure. Instead of becoming more alive, I move to being more numb. I move away from myself.

Erich Fromm identified relief as the satiation of deficiency, which he calls scarcity-pleasure, distinct from the abundance-pleasure of creation and growth., “We go to glut, relaxation, loss of tension,” he said, “in contrast to the ecstasy, the serenity one experiences when functioning easily and at the peak of one’s power. Relief is less stable or enduring than the pleasure that accompanies growth which can go on forever.”

Pleasure requires a certain degree of intimacy with ourselves. To be true to myself, I must know myself: what I enjoy, what I resist, what moves me. Pleasure asks that we reacquaint ourselves with who we are. It is through feeling sensations that we come to know ourselves in new ways. Our senses give us answers to questions such as What do I feel? What calls me? How am I affected? What am I drawn toward? What do I avoid? When do I feel most alive? The more alive we feel, the more responsibility we have. This is only fitting because we have more power when we’re fully alive. Instead of being the disembodied self that drifts away from life and goes numb, our embodied self’s aliveness grants us greater discernment.

As we become more self-aware and self-directed, our life force dramatically increases. When we are fully awake, our life force is more powerful than any trance.

The more present we are, the more consciously we choose where to direct our attention and what action to take.

So pleasure is a way of waking up! Who would have guessed it? Many of us have been taught that pleasure is the first step into the quagmire of sloth. But as Kay Redfield Jamieson asserts in her thoughtful book Exuberance, play is essential for human beings. She writes, “Play encourages fearlessness – that is, the readiness to explore one’s world, test boundaries, reward flexibility and prepare one for the unpredictable.”

Time and space for play are, nevertheless, dwindling in our culture. Today’s children have 40 percent less free time to play than they had 20 years ago. Some elementary schools have eliminated recess entirely, so students have more time to study for state-required competency tests. Such short-sightedness edges the body out of the picture and stymies our natural creativity, resilience, and excellence.

But why even bother to feel more, since life is pretty challenging as it is? Well, simply put, the more sensation we can tolerate, the more present we can be. The more present we are, the more consciously we choose where to direct our attention and what action to take. The more choice, the more power. We get to own our lives, to climb out from the valley of habits we’ve been stuck in. Life can be messy, but it doesn’t have to affect us as though a two-ton truck were barreling down upon us. We may still experience that kind of thing once in awhile, but we have options.

We now know where our feet are, and we can move out of the way with purpose and grace. And in plenty of time.

NEXT STEPS

Flexing Your Pleasure Muscle

To ensure that you don’t go the way of the squeezed and disembodied, take on the following practices.

  1. At least three times a day, stop for a moment and scan your body for sensations, as described earlier in this article. You’re an explorer traveling a new landscape, fascinated by everything you see. You don’t waste a moment of your journey judging what you find. Your curiosity is boundless.
  2. Without changing any conditions around you, how can you have more pleasure right in this moment? Make any adjustments in your soma that allow you more ease and spaciousness (adjustments to breath and tension are always great places to start).
  3. Inhabit yourself in your own version of my dog Tucker stalking her squirrel: fully present, fully alive. Notice your mood. Allow the colors and light around you to become more vivid. Feel your blood pumping, your breath moving, the sensations of your clothing against your skin. Be nowhere else but right here, right now.
  4. Notice what happens to your experience. If you like the change, keep that shape. Getting used to feeling sensations comes with – you guessed it – practice.

Victoria Castle is the author of The Trance of Scarcity (Berrett-Koehler, 2007). She coaches Fortune 500 executives, business owners, and social entrepreneurs on how to be purposeful and effective in the midst of chaos and pressure. As a Master Somatic Coach, Victoria teaches at several post-graduate and professional programs and speaks at national conferences.

The post Embodying Change: A Whole Systems Approach appeared first on The Systems Thinker.

]]>
https://thesystemsthinker.com/embodying-change-a-whole-systems-approach/feed/ 0
“Staging” a Comeback at Unilever https://thesystemsthinker.com/staging-a-comeback-at-unilever/ https://thesystemsthinker.com/staging-a-comeback-at-unilever/#respond Wed, 13 Jan 2016 09:45:04 +0000 http://systemsthinker.wpengine.com/?p=2116 ver the past couple of years, O some brave souls in the business world have started to talk about the link between personal growth and organizational change. The belief is that, because we create our organizations, unless we change how we think, act, and interact with each other, we’ll have a hard time instituting true, […]

The post “Staging” a Comeback at Unilever appeared first on The Systems Thinker.

]]>
Over the past couple of years, O some brave souls in the business world have started to talk about the link between personal growth and organizational change. The belief is that, because we create our organizations, unless we change how we think, act, and interact with each other, we’ll have a hard time instituting true, lasting shifts in business as usual. But while this approach may sound valid on the surface to some of us—or unthinkably sentimental to others—we haven’t had many examples of in it action to mull over, discuss, dissect, and even to emulate. Now we do.

In To the Desert and Back: The Story of One of the Most Dramatic Business Transformations on Record (JosseyBass, 2003), authors Philip Mirvis, Karen Ayas, and George Roth tell the story of how a visionary leader and his unconventional management team engaged the hearts and minds of a workforce to dramatically turn around the fortunes of a business unit in distress. By carefully staging a series of memorable events, including the trip to the desert referenced in the title, this innovative leadership group challenged, inspired, and united the organization to achieve outcomes that had previously been unimaginable.

Through its success, the company ultimately influenced the management practices of its parent company, a $66 billion global conglomerate, and serves as a model to all of us seeking to revitalize our organizations and achieve sustainable growth.

A Dramatic Turnaround

In the spring of 1995, Unilever Vlees Group Nederland (UVGN), a Dutch division of global food, home, and personal care products giant Unilever, was in dire straits. For the previous four years, the company had experienced declining volumes, shrinking margins, and higher costs. The competition was making inroads into the firm’s longstanding markets. To maintain profitability, UVGN had repeatedly raised prices on its food products, even as quality problems rose. Unless the unit quickly orchestrated a major turnaround, the parent company planned to put it up for sale.

Enter the new chairman, Louis “Tex” Gunning, a Unilever veteran. From the beginning, Gunning perceived the need to engage every worker’s intellect and emotions in revitalizing UVGN. Early in his tenure, he decided that they needed to experience for themselves the results of their current way of doing business. One morning, the entire company—1,400 workers in all—boarded buses and traveled to a secret destination, which turned out to be a warehouse packed full of defective products. Amid the stench of rotting food, people calculated the lost money and wasted effort that the pallets of spoiled sausage and leaky soup cans represented.

Most workers were shocked by the extent of the company’s quality shortfalls. Because the business continued to be profitable, at least on paper, they hadn’t realized the depth of its problems. The field trip dramatized how far the organization needed to go in order to remain competitive, setting the stage for a major shift in corporate culture and a stunningly rapid turnaround.

Individual and Collective Learning

The warehouse visit was just the first in a series of landmark events that punctuated the company’s journey from corporate dog to corporate racehorse. After stabilizing the business, UVGN’s managers realized that, for the company to be successful over the longer term, employees would need to develop new skills and a renewed sense of confidence. As a first step, trainers introduced some personal development tools, including the concepts from Stephen Covey’s best-selling book, The Seven Habits of Highly Successful People (Simon & Schuster, 1989).

But to face the challenges ahead, people also needed to fundamentally change how they worked together. To facilitate that process, leaders designed a “learning conference,” in which all UVGN employees gathered to hear about the current state of the business and plans for the future, to explore their roles in achieving challenging objectives, and to learn how to learn together. As with the warehouse visit, planners designed the event to have a strong sensory and emotional impact, with a mixture of entertainment, group discussions, experiential learning activities, and a culminating party. Top executives and line workers talked together about their personal aspirations, expectations, and concerns. The learning conference became an annual event and played an important role in bringing the company together, establishing the link between individual and organizational growth, giving workers the confidence to achieve stretch goals, and underscoring the company’s commitment to a new way of doing work.

In 1997, UVGN merged with the larger and more prominent Van den Bergh Nederland (VdBN). To the surprise of business observers, Gunning was made chairman of the merged organization. Over time, building on many of the techniques piloted in UVGN, members of the merged organization learned how to work together to broaden their understanding of current reality, plan for the future, and move into action.

Powerful Shared Experiences

The practice of orchestrating powerful shared experiences to help unify and inspire people reached its pinnacle during the years after the merger. For instance, shortly after the transition, a management conference was held in a churchlike building. On a screen above a dimly lit stage was the image of God’s hand reaching out to give life to Adam, adapted from Michelangelo’s mural on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel. According to the authors, “The symbolism was spellbinding. People are not alone; they are connected to the divine and to one another.” The event helped managers from the two companies to emotionally connect with one another and finally gel as a team.

Other retreats occurred in equally dramatic settings: the ruins of a medieval monastery, the Scottish highlands, a clipper ship, the Sinai desert. In each gathering, organizers paid intricate attention to the journey, presentation, lighting, imagery, sequence of activities, and so on, drawing on principles of design, folklore, performing arts, and spiritual traditions to script an unforgettable, life-altering experience for the participants. For example, at a time when the company needed to develop a collective leadership agenda, the 180 team leaders traveled to Scotland, where they began the three-day event as members of four separate “clans”: the McSoups, McMeats, McSauces, and McSpreads. The retreat culminated with a challenging two-hour climb to the top of the famed Corrain on the Isle of Skye, where the group finally came together, to raucous cheers, as the united McVan den Bergh community.

On a smaller scale, some teams simply picked apples together in the local countryside, using the experience to reflect on how they worked together in the factory. At the other extreme, the company created transformative events for its customers, inviting up to 60,000 retailers and their dates to what they called the “Big Night,” which featured entertainers, video presentations, discussions, songs, and refreshments. The collective effect of all of these activities was to connect people to each other and to the company in exciting new ways.

To the Next Level

Throughout its transformation, VdBN employed an eclectic range of tools and practices to help workers build skills for jointly addressing business issues. Many of the events included Outward Bound-type experiences, in which people challenged themselves physically and learned to rely on others. In “fishbowl meetings,” teams sat in a circle and debriefed their interpersonal dynamics, while an outer circle of people observed and learned from the process. Employees from the top of the organization to the bottom wrote and shared their “emotional lifelines,” practicing listening skills and forging a base of trust and respect in the process. And an exercise called “believers vs. cynics” explored debate, problem solving, conflict resolution, dialogue, and community as different ways to resolve conflict.

For some, these activities and the new corporate culture felt cultish and alienating. But most people wholeheartedly embraced the change and thrived in their expanded roles. They assumed all sorts of new tasks and responsibilities. They worked together more productively than before. They developed creative approaches to ongoing challenges. As one factory worker put it, “I am motivated to work faster and better. I can act on my own initiative and get quick feedback. We produce more with fewer people. . . . I get satisfaction from what I do.”

The business results of this process are incontrovertible. From 1998 to the present, VdBN experienced a renaissance: a plethora of new products, the revitalization of old ones, heightened brand awareness, a focus on new distribution channels and markets, a commitment to experimentation, and a fine-tuning of strategy. Business units achieved double-digit growth, and factories dramatically improved efficiencies. The organization had truly created a lasting legacy of growth.

Tex Gunning left VdBN in 2000 in a dramatic passing-of-the-torch ceremony that took place in Petra, Jordan, during a leadership retreat in that region. Under the new chairman, some of the leading-edge practices were eliminated. But the core of the corporate culture remained intact. As Gunning is quoted as saying, “Once people have felt the freedom and they begin to lead, you can never take that feeling away.” Certain activities have filtered up to Unilever as a whole, including team-building exercises, stretch goals that require new knowledge to accomplish, learning gatherings and Big Night events, and leadership retreats to exotic locales such as Costa Rica, Iceland, and Croatia.

To the Desert and Back does not purport to offer a set recipe for success. What is does do is show how the work of change must start in the heart and soul, mind and body of every member of the organization. This approach is not gratuitous, touchy-feely, or “soft”—rather, it is an integral part of any management toolbox, merger process, or corporate restructuring or overhaul. For unless people believe they are part of creating a new future, they will remain hopelessly mired in the practices of the past.

Janice Molloy is managing editor of THE SYSTEMS THINKER.

The post “Staging” a Comeback at Unilever appeared first on The Systems Thinker.

]]>
https://thesystemsthinker.com/staging-a-comeback-at-unilever/feed/ 0
Birthing the Future Together Through Conversation https://thesystemsthinker.com/birthing-the-future-together-through-conversation/ https://thesystemsthinker.com/birthing-the-future-together-through-conversation/#respond Sun, 10 Jan 2016 11:03:29 +0000 http://systemsthinker.wpengine.com/?p=2549 ritten in short essay form, Margaret Wheatley’s latest book, Turning to One Another (BerrettKoehler, 2002), invites us to talk about what we truly care about and to listen to others with our hearts and our minds. Perhaps more important now than ever before, this book encourages us to spend some time thinking about what we […]

The post Birthing the Future Together Through Conversation appeared first on The Systems Thinker.

]]>
Written in short essay form, Margaret Wheatley’s latest book, Turning to One Another (BerrettKoehler, 2002), invites us to talk about what we truly care about and to listen to others with our hearts and our minds. Perhaps more important now than ever before, this book encourages us to spend some time thinking about what we hope for the future. Helping us with this important task, Wheatley deftly uses her usual warm, autobiographical approach to show us what she believes and how she herself wants to be held accountable for those beliefs and make them visible in her actions. Because of her prompting, I found myself asking, “What is my faith in the future? How willing am I to have my beliefs and ideas challenged. How willing am I to be disturbed?”

In her earlier writings, Wheatley deepened her readers’ understanding of how systems behave. The world is inherently orderly, she has said, as she invited us to live simply as partners within its playful dance. In this book, she goes a step further—she exhorts us to collectively birth the future.

Conversational Practices

The book is organized in three parts. The first part sets out the power, the courage, and the practices of conversation. Wheatley has been hosting dialogues of various kinds for a decade. But her appreciation of the potential of conversation has been deepened by two approaches that generate deep insights, a strong sense of community, and innovative possibilities for action. From Christina Baldwin, Wheatley gained a deeper understanding of circle and council practices for evoking compassionate listening and authentic conversation. From Juanita Brown and David Isaacs, she has incorporated the World Café, an exciting way to focus on “conversations that matter and questions that travel well.” This approach links small-group conversations in a way that causes knowledge to grow and the collective wisdom of the group to become visible to participants. Based on learnings from these and other sources, Wheatley founded The Four Directions, a global initiative that links local circles of leaders in a worldwide network on behalf of life affirming futures.

The brief second portion of the book is devoted to simple yet captivating sketches by Vivienne Flesher, coupled with pithy hand-scripted statements such as “It’s not differences that divide us. It’s our judgments about each other that do.” These statements or questions, often accompanied by a thought-provoking quotation, lend an “open-journal” feel to the book. Some readers may be prompted to add their own thoughts to these pages, making it an even more personal document.

Profound Challenges

It is the third part of the book that most people will find particularly useful. The author calls this last and longest section “Conversation Starters.” Each of the 10 “chapters” provides the framework for a conversation that readers themselves might host. With stories, quotations, and poetry interspersed throughout, Wheatley has lovingly compiled a set of resources that compel readers to thoughtful action on profound challenges.

For instance, she asks, “When have I experienced working for the common good?” and prompts conversation groups to dig deep inside to answer such questions as “How many times were you surprised by someone’s ingenuity, or your own?” She concludes this topic by reminding us that “if we raised our expectations, then it wouldn’t take a crisis for us to experience the satisfaction of working together, the joy of doing work that serves other human beings. And then we would discover, as the Chinese author of the Tao te Ching wrote 2,500 years ago, that ‘the good becomes common as grass.’”

This is an inspirational book at its core. It frees us to be our better selves. It’s all about service and community, and caring and unselfish behaviors. Because of its early 2002 publishing date, Wheatley must have written much of the material prior to the September 11 attacks, yet each page pulses with thoughts readers will find even more provocative since that dreadful day. One page features a World Trade Center survivor’s words: “We didn’t save ourselves. We tried to save each other.” Life is, indeed, too short to be selfish.

Wheatley also shares with us her experiences of the sacred, which is nothing special, she says—just all of life. She ends with an Aztec story about a forest fire, an owl, and a small Quetzal bird who attempts to put out the fire with tiny droplets from its beak. The owl questions this behavior, pointing out the futility of it all, but the tiny bird says, “I’m doing the best I can with what I have.”

That is, after all, the best any of us might do. Conversation, Wheatley says, requires that we extend ourselves to others, curious about what their stories might hold. For in the telling, the teller and the listener each becomes more fully human. And finally, she exhorts us, to trust that meaningful conversations can change our world.

Karen Speerstra (kspeerstra@aol.com) is a coach, writer, and editor based in central Vermont. During her 20-year career in professional and college text publishing, she was publishing director at Butterworth-Heinemann and founded a line of business books focusing on knowledge management, visionary leadership, change management, HR, and organizational development.

The post Birthing the Future Together Through Conversation appeared first on The Systems Thinker.

]]>
https://thesystemsthinker.com/birthing-the-future-together-through-conversation/feed/ 0